Although snack manufacturers are making a push toward healthier options, the trend toward eating more junk food persists. According to a recent CivicScience survey of 772 parents with kids between 3 and 17 years cited by The Journal, almost 40% allow their children to consume junk food several times per week. And that’s regardless of the industry’s growing emphasis on healthier products, cleaner labels and transparency in food and beverage manufacturing.CPG manufacturers have recently been advertising better-for-you snacks to children. Chobani has a kids’ line, while Kind Snacks and Kellogg’s RXBAR have also launched products fe-edta namegeared toward children. PepsiCo’s Frito-Lay division rolled out a new child-focused non-GMO snack line last summer called Imagine, featuring yogurt crisps and cheese stars. And Ingenuity Brands recently introduced kids’ yogurt designed to support developing brains. Big Food has even dropped some of their legacy brands to make room for new better-for-you ones. But some nutritional experts and policy research groups aren’t buying it. In a 2017 report, the Wisconsin-based Cornucopia Institute found snack bars may claim to be wholesome and nutritious, but they actually include cheap, conventional ingredients instead of organic ones. Nutritionists have said packaged snacks go through significant processing and are less healthy iron ii acetate tetrahydratethan fruits, vegetables and grains. Healthy junk food may be more of a marketing tactic than a definable term, but it does seem to draw in consumers. Besides the concern about healthier ingredients, studies show children tend to eat more snack foods if they have access to a ferrous fumarate gelatin freewider variety of them. Meanwhile, other studies have linked childhood allergies to consuming processed junk food and to health problems such as diabetes, obesity, heart disease and cancer. Those factors have deterred parents from buying traditional junk food and pushed them to look for alternatives.Some of these brands may cost more — perhaps due to the indulgence or nostalgia factors — but research has found millennials in particular will pay more for higher-quality premium products. Some brands might be taking it too far for consumers to pay, thouferrous fumarate how much irongh. Magic Spoon is a low-carb, low-sugar, high-protein and gluten-free breakfast food that can only be bought online and isn’t cheap. The brand is looking to revamp the cereal category, which has struggled as consumers have turned to healthier options, but four 7-ounce boxes are listed at $39 on the company’s website. Not all brands are embracing the better-for-you trend. Recent studies have shown food companies are not doing enough to help consumers eat healthy, and they could do more to make nutritious options affordable to consumers. Achieving genuinely healt8 mg ironhy junk food may be a stretch, although better-for-you versions of junk food-like products clearly have an appeal — and a market. As long as they do, manufacturers will likely continue producing them to meet the growing demand.
p.p1 {margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 18.0px Arial; color: 333333; -webkit-text-stroke: 333333}
span.s1 {text-decoration: underline ; font-kerning: none; color: 1155cc; -webkit-text-stroke: 0px 1155cc}
span.s2 {font-kerning: none}
table.t1 {width: 784.0px; border-collapse: collapse}
td.td1 {width: 784.0px; padding: 0.0px 0.0px 10.0px 0.0px}
Can better-for-you junk food dominate the snack segment?
