News
Chile’s warning labelling and marketing rules for unhealthy foods led to “significant decreases” in purchases of food and drinks with high levels of sugar, salt and fat, according to a study published in the journal PLOS Medicine. The Chilean Law of Food Labelling and Advertising, implemented in three phases in 2016, 2018 and 2019, mandated front-of-pack warning labels on food and beverages, restricted food marketing to children, and banned the sales of products ‘high-in’ nutrients of concern – like sugar and saturated fats – in schools. Each phase brought increasingly strict nutrition thresholds, with a daytime marketing ban for unhealthy food ads on television, regardless of audience, coming into effect in phase 2 as well.In the study, the academics from Chile and the US compared data on purchases from 2,844 households from 1 July 2013 to 25 June 2019 to a ‘counterfactual scenario’ (hypothetical food purchases if the policies were not in place).After phase 2 they found purchases of foods high in nutrients of concern decreased: 36.8% in sugar; 23% in energy; 21.9% in sodium; and 15.7% in saturated fat. “The declines in ‘high in’ products purchased were partially offset by increased purchases from ‘not high-in’ products,” they wrote. “Still, the overall changes resulted in net declines in nutrients of concern purchase ranging from 8.3% to 20.2%.”The effects were “more pronounced” in phase 2. Also of note was the fact that in phase 1 the reductions seemed to be driven by a large immediate drop in the concerning nutrients – perhaps due to reformulation – whereas in the second phase there were “larger changes over time, possibly representing behavioural shifts”. The academics also found that the results were “similar” across socioeconomic groups: focus groups showed that low-SES parents paid attention to, understood and used warning labels. Howferrous sulfate and fumarateever, one limitation was that the data used was up until mid-2019, after which there was Chilean social unrest, food supply chain volatility, global food price inflation and the covid-19 pandemic – all events which could have “blunted” the effect of the policies in low-SES households, according to the experts.Further studies will be needed of whether front-of-pack labels are still working in a different price environment, said Chris Hilson, professor of environmental law at the University of Reading, UK. “That will presumably depend on whether the ‘not-high in’ foods have gone up in price more than the ‘high-in’ ones. If they have, then labels will clearly need to be mixed with other policy levers like nutrient taxes and subsidies.”Indeed, the authors of the paper noted in their conclusion that “… marketing and labelling policies to disincentivise unhealthy food choices may have limited effect if not implemented alongside policies that increase affordability or availability of healthier food choices”. In other words, regulation on labels and adverts will not be enough to improve people’s health.They also highlighted that their data only included a portion of what Chilean households purchase – total dietary intake data would be needed to fully evaluate these policies. However, the results are promising, said nutritionists. “Chile has a comprehensive package of children’s health and nutrition policies which overall ladder up to improve food environments and protect children’s health,” said Ali Morpeth, a registered nutritionist and consultant on sustainable food and diets, based in the UK. Theomeprazole and ferrous sulfate restrictions of junk food in and around schools alongside front of pack labelling laws puts the country in a “leadership position”, she added.Chile’s policy requiring mandatory warning labels on the front of ‘high-in’ foods has snowballed across South and ferrous gluconate heartburnNorth America with a number of countries having implemented or started the process of implementing similar policies. There is interest further afield too in standardised front-of-pack labelling, which is on the World Health Organization’s ‘best buys’ for combatting non-communicable diseases.A separate study, published in the American Journal of Public Health, showed high compliance with the front-of-pack labelling laws in Chile from across the food industry. The law requires packaged food and drinks with added saturated fats, sugars or sodium and exceeding set limits to carry a mandatory warning label on the front with the words ‘high-in’ saturated fats, sugars, sodium or calories. The government provided detailed guidance for industry to follow. For example, if a product displays any ‘high-in’ label, itiron glycine complex cannot include health descriptors or any nutritional descriptors that are incompatible with the nutrient in question, explained Natalia Rebolledo, an assistant professor from the Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (CIAPEC) at the University of Chile, who led the research (and who was also involved in the PLOS Medicine study).The team, which also included academics from the University of North Carolina in the US and the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain, found 62.5% of packaged food and beverages displayed a front-of-pack label, with compliance reaching 93.6% for any ‘high-in’ regulated nutrients.The experts said it is difficult to isolate the impact of the labels since they were implemented alongside other measures under the food labiron ferrous sulfate side effectselling and advertising law. However, focus group discussions with parents indicated that they perceive products with more labels as less healthy than those with fewer labels, Rebolledo told Ingredients Network.“Other governments can learn that the food industry can adapt to mandatory display of FoPLs when clear guidelines and effective monitoring systems are in place,” she added. “In Chile, the Ministry of Health played an important role in ensuring and sustaining high compliance.”Professor Hilson said that what “comes out clearly” from this study is the need for detailed guidance for industry so they know precisely what is required of them and how to comply”. That compliance in Chile’s case is the responsibility of retailers also appeared crucial. “That’s perhaps unexpected,” he explained. “Most would assume the responsibility for complying with front-of-pack labelling rules would be on manufacturers. But the study shows that supermarket supply chain power seems to work rather effectively.”
Chile’s food labelling laws produce healthy results
