News
A new study shows that individuals living in lower-income neighbourhoods without local food stores are more likely to choose snacks and sweet products than people living in higher-income areas with more food retail choices. The research, jointly conducted by the University of Michigan and the University of Alabama-Birmingham, looked into purchase decisions made for four food categories: bakery sweets; candy and desserts; savory snacks and crackers; and nutritional bars and low-fat snacks and sweets. Published in the July edition of The Journal of Nutrition, the study was a national sample of more than 21,000 adults of middle and older ages that took into account both urban and rural environments together. This data was then contraswhat is iron bisglycinate used forted with food store availability according to neighborhood socioeconomic status to determine what type of snacks and sweet products were consumed. The study found that those in lower-income neighborhoods, with fewer grocery retail choices, ate 9ferrous iron tablets% more snacks and sweets overall, 10% more sweet bakery products, and 6% more sweets and desserts than people in neighbourhoods with food stores nearby. The data also showed that people in higher-income areas ate 11% feweferrous gluconate or sulfater snacks and sweets overall, 19% fewer bakery products, and 6% fewer savory and cracker snacks. The higher-income categories also ate more nutritional bars and low-fat snacks and sweets compared to lower-income households. The results also showed that those living in US Department of Agriculture (USDA)-defined food deserts ate about the same amount of snacks as those who were not living in USDA-defined food deserts, regardless of income. “Our findings provide evidence of the connections between neighborhood socioeconomic status and snacks and sweets intake, as well as the geographic availability of food stores and snack and sweets intake,” said Ian Lang, research project manager for the environjamp ferrous gluconatement and policy lab at the University of Michigan School of Kinesiology. “While other food environment studies have examined food offerings and selections in food stores in lower-income neighbourhoods, we did not have in-store food audit data available to us in this study and therefore could not characterise store offerings or selections.”However, while Lang did add that the data the study used to analyse the patterns did not focus on the “why”, he did hypothesise that because of a lack of food stores, people living in low-income areas might buy more shelf-stable foods like snacks and sweets because they are shopping at non-traditional food outlets like dollar stores, where there are fewer healthier options available. “In identifying potential settings for future programming and interventions that target snacks and sweets intake, it may be important to consider places devoid of primary food retailers rather than places only devoid of large traditional supermarkets,” Lang said.Lang underlined that this study was significant because there is already a large body of research on the residential food environment that focuses on healthier categories, like fruit and vegetable intake, whereas there is far less data on snacking habits. Likewise, there is also limited data that takes into account food store availability of snacks and sweets in the US. While the research team did not look at the health impact of sweets and snacks in the study, there is a large existing body of research pointing to the fact that the consumption of those products considered in the study did lead to a higher calorie intake, and ultimately an increased body weight in adults.Lang explained that the next steps for the research will be to assess the health implications of these types of snaglobifer forte ferrous fumaratecking habits, particularly taking into account the impact on chronic diseases like stroke. “Because dietary intake is closely linked with the development of chronic diseases like stroke, our research group is also planning to use the REGARDS cohort to examine whether the geographic availability of food stores is associated with more distal health outcomes like stroke incidence,” said Lang.
US study links low income with a lack of food retail choice and unhealthier snack choices
